Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 5:21:51 GMT -5
Commitment to its change: the delegitimization of the reform will open a path for it to lose strength and aggressiveness and begin to generate dynamics for its reversal . Forcing the response on the attitude towards the strike due to the immediate possibilities of its substantial modification was to reduce its meaning to an extreme and short-term utilitarianism, disregarding its underlying consequences to weaken and modify it, as well as the entire social, democratic and expressive dimension of unionism. , the working classes and active citizens. Therefore, deducing that two thirds of the population are against the strike was excessive; With these data and despite this very biased question, a third of employees are against the labor reform and justify the general strike and another third is also against the same reform, but believes that the strikes will not stop it. be able to change now (and they can have counterproductive consequences.
The issue is not that this assessment is unrealistic, which it partially is, but that it is unilateral. That factor should not be the determining factor for non-participation because there were more plans, realities and objectives to justify and express the rejection of this reform: its unfair nature, the Australia Phone Number\ demand for its change and building the foundations to achieve it. The third assessment has to do with a realistic assessment of the initial social support for the general strike to overcome some difficulties and strengthen participation and sympathy towards it. The result of another survey from the beginning of February by the same company Metroscopia ( El País newspaper 12-2-2012) was already known previously, where 46% of the population (67% of PSOE voters) would agree with the call. of the general strike. That is to say, more than half of the salaried working population and more than two thirds of the entire electoral base of the left consider it justified – assuming that the rest of the voters on the left and part of the abstentions would have higher support.
In short, it was a fair and legitimate mobilizing process, the rejection of the labor reform and the social cuts of the right is supported by the majority of society; It was a channel for the expression of indignation and social unrest, and its objectives included stopping social regression and demanding rectification of socio-labor and employment policy. It meant the reaffirmation of the union movement in its dynamic and representative capacity, and a rebalancing of the contractual capacity of the working layers in companies, still weak in the face of the reinforcement of business power that this labor reform entailed. Together with the precedents of the social protest process of the years 2010 and 2011 and its continuity until , it was a beginning, not the end of the path of change. He expressed a brake on the offensive of the PP Government that limited its regressive scope.
The issue is not that this assessment is unrealistic, which it partially is, but that it is unilateral. That factor should not be the determining factor for non-participation because there were more plans, realities and objectives to justify and express the rejection of this reform: its unfair nature, the Australia Phone Number\ demand for its change and building the foundations to achieve it. The third assessment has to do with a realistic assessment of the initial social support for the general strike to overcome some difficulties and strengthen participation and sympathy towards it. The result of another survey from the beginning of February by the same company Metroscopia ( El País newspaper 12-2-2012) was already known previously, where 46% of the population (67% of PSOE voters) would agree with the call. of the general strike. That is to say, more than half of the salaried working population and more than two thirds of the entire electoral base of the left consider it justified – assuming that the rest of the voters on the left and part of the abstentions would have higher support.
In short, it was a fair and legitimate mobilizing process, the rejection of the labor reform and the social cuts of the right is supported by the majority of society; It was a channel for the expression of indignation and social unrest, and its objectives included stopping social regression and demanding rectification of socio-labor and employment policy. It meant the reaffirmation of the union movement in its dynamic and representative capacity, and a rebalancing of the contractual capacity of the working layers in companies, still weak in the face of the reinforcement of business power that this labor reform entailed. Together with the precedents of the social protest process of the years 2010 and 2011 and its continuity until , it was a beginning, not the end of the path of change. He expressed a brake on the offensive of the PP Government that limited its regressive scope.